Paul Marco


Paul is a Managing Partner of the firm. He has over 25 years' experience advising on a broad range of property disputes acting for institutions, private companies, entrepreneurial investors and retailers.

The breadth of Paul's experience can be seen from his involvement in a number of the leading reported property litigation cases covering areas including; the assessment of damages for terminal dilapidations, Shortlands Investments Limited v Cargill (1995); the effect of forfeiture, Ivory Gate v Spetale (1998), the inclusion of a redevelopment break clause in a renewal lease, Davys of London (Wine Merchants) Limited v City of London Corporation (2004), the recovery of damages by an assignee of rights where the assignor sustained no loss Bizspace (NE) Limited v Baird Corporatewear Limited (2007), the effect of a settlement agreement on the validity of a tenant's break notice, Legal & General v Expeditors International (UK) Limited (2007), whether a warehouse converted into four apartments was eligible for collective enfranchisement, Smith v Jafton Properties Limited (2013), the successful strikeout of a forfeiture claim, R Square Properties Limited v Reach Learning Limited (2017) and whether a withholding of consent on the basis of the risk of enfranchisement is reasonable, Rotrust Nominees Limited v Hautford Limited (2018).

Paul has been recommended in the legal directories for many years. He "knows everything there is to know about property litigation".

Chambers 2018
News

Success for Trowers & Hamlins at the National Paralegal Awards 2021

Explore
News

Finalist flurry for Trowers at the National Paralegal Awards

Explore
News

Trowers & Hamlins bolsters commercial dispute resolution team with new partner Navinder Grover

Explore
News

Trowers & Hamlins bolsters Birmingham construction offering with new partner Paul Scott

Explore
Insight

First Remediation Order obtained by Government under the Building Safety Act 2022

Explore
Insight

Supreme Court rules on private nuisance and Japanese Knotweed in Davis v Bridgend County Borough Council

Explore